Growing up we are
taught that in order to live a healthy lifestyle we need to eat a proper
breakfast, lunch, and dinner.
But why do we eat three meals a day?
Is there
actually a biological reason for chowing down at these regimented times?
Should
I feel guilty for having a big old cup of coffee for breakfast and then
snacking throughout the day when I’m hungry?
It seems the three meal
rule is more of a cultural model than a biological necessity.
“The number of
meals eaten every day is a cultural pattern people have adopted because there's
comfort in predictability,”
Paul Freedman, Yale University history professor
and editor of Food: The History of Taste, told How Stuff Works. When work hours
became regularized, the big three became integrated into our daily schedules.
Hence, the nine-to-five and the three-meals-a-day are symbiotic. But modern
work schedules are changing, and it seems the traditional meal plan is
suffering for it.
As children we are told
that “breakfast is the most important meal of the day.” This slogan was
promoted throughout the 1920s and ‘30s by the US government.
There is evidence
to support that eating breakfast improves cognitive function and performance at
school — giving kids the energy they need to succeed.
Another reason behind
breakfast is that children are able to concentrate better when they are not
focusing on the fact that they are hungry.
But eating "a balanced
breakfast" might not be as important as we assume.
Breakfast got its lofty
reputation in the mid-19th century during the Industrial Revolution.
Workers
heading off to taxing jobs needed a hearty meal in the morning, and the trend
caught on with all social classes.
Today, many people are forgoing breakfast
all together, about 15 percent in total, due to busy work schedules — or, at
least for me, the wish to sleep in as late as possible.
In a survey
administered by the US Department of Agriculture, most respondents described
eating primarily at noon and around six at night.
Many diet plans tell us that
eating breakfast helps people maintain a healthy weight, but that is not
entirely true.
If you are active, breakfast can help burn calories faster, but
it doesn’t decide how many calories you are going to consume during the day (or
magically stave off snacking), says research by The American Journal of
Clinical Nutrition and Medical Daily.
The Romans ate only one
meal, and that was lunch.
Eating more than one big meal around noon was
considered way too indulgent for them.
Today, most of us eat takeout or a
pre-packaged sandwich in front of our computer; seeing lunch as a quick bite to
sustain us till dinner.
But during the Industrial Revolution, lunch was an
integral part of the laborers' day, giving them a short respite between the
long hours at the factory.
And I remember even in elementary school, there was no sweeter sound
than the lunch bell, where everyone could trot down to the cafeteria for 45
blissful minutes.
But like breakfast, many people are shifting importance
away from lunch, focusing their attentions on dinner as the main meal of the
day.
In the 1950s, dinner
was a cultural phenomenon.
The “family dinner”
became the sacred cornerstone of many households.
We can thank the microwave dinner, introduced
in 1986, for altering our perceptions of a formal “home cooked” meal.
Culturally we like
routine, and indeed sometimes our bodies crave predictability as well. But,
just because you eat when you feel like it doesn’t mean you are unhealthy, so
go on, graze as you please!
Video: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqYPhGiB9tkShZorfgcL2lA
No comments:
Post a Comment